The value creation plan, live.
Every initiative tracked to its EBITDA contribution, with progress, slippage and risk visible at a glance. The live record your steering committee works from, not slides rebuilt for it.
You track what the portfolio is worth. What's tracking the plan that makes it worth more?
The plan is written once, presented at IC, and then lives in a spreadsheet. By month four, no one can say which initiatives are actually moving EBITDA, which are three weeks from slipping, or what the plan is now worth against the thesis. Operating partners chase portcos for updates; portco execs rebuild the same board pack every month. Value leaks quietly, and the first honest conversation about it happens far too close to exit.
The plan and the delivery reality drift apart
Steering committees see a plan on a slide that got updated last week. Risks surface through conversation, not a live view. No one can say, without a phone call, which of the forty initiatives are actually on track this week.
One live record, for both sides of the table
Every initiative, risk, decision, assumption and dependency lives in one place, owned, dated, and status-tracked — so the operating partner's view and the portco's working reality are the same view.
Depth the portfolio-monitoring tools don't go to
Most tools built for PE portfolios stop at status. Command was built out of the mechanics of actually running a value creation programme.
Monitoring tools tell you what happened. Delivery tools tell you what's busy. Command is the only one that scores value with a weighted framework and runs the delivery that produces it.
Value, scored
The Enterprise Value Index scores every initiative against six weighted value levers, from Commercial Growth to Data and AI, rolling up to a live Enterprise Value Heatmap. Not a status colour: a weighted view of what the plan is worth right now.
Delivery, evidenced
Full PMO depth sits beneath the value layer: project register, opportunity pipeline, RAIDD log and resource register. The EBITDA number stands up at the board table because the delivery evidence behind it does.
Adoption, managed
Change load, capacity to absorb it, impact, champions and business readiness tracked as first-class data. Most value creation plans fail at adoption, not at design — Command treats that as a measurable risk, not a soft one.
Portfolio, connected
Group, sub-group and portfolio company structure, built in from day one. Operating partners see the fund. Portco execs see their business. One system, no reconciliation, no gaps.
Built for the operating partner and the portco team, at once
See the whole portfolio without chasing a single update
A live Enterprise Value Index for every portfolio company, and an Enterprise Value Heatmap breaking each one down by business area, rolled up from what delivery teams are actually recording.
- Enterprise Value Heatmap, by business area
- Governance by role, across every portco
- One structure, from fund down to initiative
Run the plan where the work actually happens
The same record the operating partner sees is the one the delivery team works from daily — no second version to maintain for reporting day.
- Project register, RAIDD log, change tracking
- Owners, dates and status on every initiative
- Reporting exports, not a reporting rebuild
Five Founding Partner places.
Now open.
We're onboarding a small cohort of PE funds and portfolio companies to shape the next phase of Command. Founding Partners lock in preferential terms for the life of their contract and get a direct say in the roadmap. If your value creation plan needs a live delivery record this quarter, let's talk.
All conversations strictly confidential.
